On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:34:38PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > Why should xfsprogs install i386 packages when vim doesn't? > > b/c, afaik, there is no i386 package for vim in the x86_64 tree. > > Yeah, I think that's his point -- from a user point of view, it's > unpredictable behavior. is it? yum will install all archs that it CAN seems predictable to me. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
