Re: Dependencies a little excessive?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 14:56 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 14:51 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 August 2006 14:48, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > No, I don't like the behavior of installing both arches by default.
> > 
> > I don't personally either, but I have the capacity to fix that for my system.  
> > I'm just repeating the reasoning that was given to me the last time I bitched 
> > about it.
> 
> So everyone hates it? anyone in favor? 

I'm strongly in favor.  It removes some of the weirdness about caring
about which order packages get installed in as well as making things
just more consistent.

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux