On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 22:34 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > The argument-which-I-hope-I-will-not-restart applies here too -- Macromedia > _ought_ to make an x86_64 version, and they have less incentive to if all > the distro vendors make it easier for them to just ship i386 everywhere. Basically they don't seem to have a single clue how to write portable software, or use pre-existing libraries: (and they're hiring) http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/08/porting-flash-player-to-alternative.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
