Le lundi 31 juillet 2006 à 11:11 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit : > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:04:16AM -0400, Demond wrote: > > Is there a reason the firefox.i386 and firefox-devel.i386 packages are > > in the x86_64 repo for rawhide? They both got pulled into my system > > when the firefox-devel package was introduced. However, "yum remove > > firefox.i386" shows that there are no dependencies. I was just > > wondering if this was deliberate and if they will be around for a while. > > It's handy if you have to use the flash plugin.... Except x86_64 OO.o will require x86_64 firefox, which will stomp on the i386 one, and kill flash. Anyone managed to build http://www.gibix.net/dokuwiki/en:projects:nspluginwrapper yet? -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
