Re: Maintainer for nvidia-crap in lvn wanted (Re: Pull off AIGLX repoistory?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 15:50 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
> Peter Gordon wrote:
> > Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> > 
> >> The Nvidia drivers (or ATI ones) are not 'illegal'. The slides you point
> >> to doesn't even claim they are. [...]
> > 
> > 
> > No disrespect intended, but did you even read those slides? The 13th
> > slide that Greg KH has on his site explicitly states - in big bold red
> > lettering: "Closed source Linux kernel modules are illegal."
> 
> The problem is obviously that it's not up to him to decide.

I think you're mistaken there. Since Greg is one of the authors of the
kernel, to a large degree it IS up to him to decide under what terms
people get to use the parts of the kernel he wrote. Now Greg is a nice
guy and he makes them available under a restricted but open license
(generally called "GPL version 2"), but still. 


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux