Arthur Pemberton wrote: > Back in FC4 I think it was, a newer vesion of KDE came out > approximately halfway though the Fedora life which fixed at least > three problems that I (and others I am sure) had which had rendered > serveral applications useless. So for half of a Fedora an update was > _not_ made as I was told it was a general policy not to do major > updates within a realse cycle. > > Similarly, when MySQL jumped to 4.1 I think it was, Fedora stayed with > 4.0 for the entire release cycle, for apperently no reason other than > the no major update policy. This kind of thing is not a general Fedora policy but is rather (generally) left to the discretion of the package's maintainer in question. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
