Re: Pull off AIGLX repoistory?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



most people here hasn't understood me right here again:
I have *not* said that fedora/redhat developers should test their apps against binary drivers/apps/whatever before releasing them; I have also not said that the should not ship this updates; my idea was *if* the developer knows (without any needed tests; like in this case) that a update will break a software (beiing it thirdparty opensource or. binary driver etc.) he should atleast inform the users somehow (like in the update anouncement). This would *not* add any extra work and would not break users systems silently.. if the devleoper does not know that the package will break anything, he should not test every binary driver/app etc. to find this out; if such an update gets shipped and breaks anything .. than well let it be ... but if we knows this before releasing the a package why should we just ignore users of a some software? this has nothing to do with stable api/abi or anything like this , this is informing users before breaking their systems P.S: I use the nvidia driver too; but I don't really care because I know how to deal with such breakage, but *many* other users don't they will switch distro or if they are new users go back to windows which is even worse.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux