On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:37:22 -0400, you wrote: >On Wednesday 26 July 2006 13:30, Denis Leroy wrote: >> This goes beyond binary-only drivers. What if you were using FC-5 as a >> major development platform for your own Xorg-based application (or >> gnome, or kde), then an FC-5 update breaks your code in a major way... > >And you really shouldn't be using a Fedora release as a Major Development >Platform. That's not what Fedora is designed and meant to be. That's a far >better job for RHEL where you've got promised ABI/API stability, a very long >lifespan, and a lot of effort to ensure things don't change with the updates. >Fedora is a more free flowing tool for evaluating technology, where things >can and do churn, change, and sometimes break. So does this mean objective number 4 should be removed from the Objectives of the Fedora Project page? "Provide a robust development platform for building software, particularly open source software." http://fedora.redhat.com/about/objectives.html -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
