On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:25:41 +0200, you wrote: >Hi. > >On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:18:48 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > >> Any update should not be pushed out to a release that breaks the users >> system, whether it be a binary driver, binary application, or even >> custom scripts that depend on a given version of a language/library >> that breaks. > >You have just described RHEL. I described the expectations of any released product that doesn't otherwise up front say otherwise. RHEL offers such an expectation for the lifetime of each release (up to 7 years). By not stating otherwise, Fedora implies that expectation with each release for the approximately 1 year that each release is supported. Rawhide/devel makes it quite clear that you can expect things to break so there can be no expectation of stability by the user. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
