Rahul wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Rahul wrote:
dragoran wrote:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=946216&postcount=4
but this should not stop you from realeasing xorg-7.1
if someone for (whatever reason) don't wont to use it they should
still wait until updated drivers are available.
but we should atleast inform user that the new X will break their
drivers (fedoranews)
but silently break things _is_ wrong
Should we also put out notices every time a kernel updates breaks
non-free third party kernel modules?
if we know that it will break a module that many users use than why not?
We dont test out proprietary software against any update produced by
Fedora. Why should Xorg or kernel updates be a exception?
We are not talking about a formal test process. But if we do have the
information (about an update breaking a popular proprietary package), I
don't see why we should intentionally withhold it.
Also, if we have a group of volunteers willing to test popular
proprietary packages (PPPs), I also don't see how it hurts anyone. I do
use VMWare extensively for all my OSS development and packaging,
certainly I'm willing to test new kernel update candidates...
-denis
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
