On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:22:31PM +0200, dragoran wrote: > ok than change it in rpm (there should be no diff.) the result would be > in both cases faster updates. Bad idea either. What about the following: package A is installed/upgraded %post A: runs ldconfig package B is installed/upgraded %post B: uses utility of A that needs a library of A There is no magic intelligence that could see if the %post install can be postponed, because a subsequent installed package may need its result (even that of ldconfig) during its installation. B.t.w., did you measure what (percentage of) time could be won when collecting the ldconfig calls? I really don't think it's worth the pain... -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
