-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tomas Mraz wrote: >> (3) Every application using digital certificates (and capable of >> checking certs against a list of trusted CA certs) creates the >> directories /etc/pki/$appname/private, /etc/pki/$appname/public and >> /etc/pki/$appname/cacerts for storing certs. The last one by default is >> a symlink pointing to /etc/pki/cacerts. > > AFAIK directory as symlink in a package creates problems on package > upgrades so it would be best to leave them simply as empty directories. What kind of problems do you mean? Looking e.g. in /etc I see many directory symlinks. > The rest of your proposal is fine I think. Great. As mentioned, I think there should be some "official" guidelines on how to deal with digital certificates. I would like to write a draft and publish it at some "official" place for further discussion (where?). How should I proceed? Joachim - -- B. Sc. Joachim Selke Universität Hannover, Institut für Theoretische Informatik Appelstraße 4, 30167 Hannover, Germany <http://www.thi.uni-hannover.de/> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEwOBzq7fYj4TsIUwRAjO3AKCtOUuT9ESD09IvRYlPBcU+FRzNQACglLw3 Enzir6fULJM4fyIkdea/cw8= =Es7o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
