Rahul wrote:
n0dalus wrote:
On 7/13/06, Rahul <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The bug report is not about successful transcations (ie) package being
installed, cleaning the cache which is expected behavior with
keepcache=0. The problem is with unsuccesful ones cleaning out the
cache. An example would be yum failing on file conflicts and removing
the packages from cache while it shouldnt.
Perhaps you misread the bug report. It says that after an error yum
keeps the cache, but then when performing a subsequent successful
operation (ie just upgrading a single package) all the packages and
headers (not just from that single package) are deleted.
This indeed describes a slightly different problem which is described
better in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188075
Ah. I didnt explain that right. The problem I was trying to reproduce is
better described in the above bug report. My original mail refers to a
slightly different issue.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
