Re: libm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 11 July 2006 21:51, Rudi Chiarito wrote:
> Under FC5/x86_64:
>
> # ldd -r /usr/lib64/libfftw.so.2
> undefined symbol: cos   (/usr/lib64/libfftw.so.2)
> undefined symbol: sin   (/usr/lib64/libfftw.so.2)
> [...]
>
> The libraries in the FC3/x86_64 package do reference libm properly.
> That's the part that makes no sense to me and I can't see anything in
> the spec files that might explain the two different behaviours.
> Different includes, maybe?

  For some reason your first message escaped my radar the first time.

  I am fftw2 packager and I am busy at the moment. If you find any fix for 
this I would like to hear to fix it.

  FWIW FC4/x86_64 has the same behaviour as FC5/x86_64.

-- 
José Abílio

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux