On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:53:52PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > Well it ended here because it did happen on FC5 and rawhide but not on > Windows. So it seemed that OOo worked correctly and FC changed something > that made it not work correctly on FC. Can you please describe what "it" is? Does the file: 1) Take up the same number of pages in both Windows and FC5, but is different in Rawhide? 2) Take up the same number of pages in Windows and Rawhide, but change between FC5 and Rawhide? 3) Or something else? Do you have examples of files which render differently in FC5 and Rawhide and Windows? There were changes done to rendering between FC5 and Rawhide to use font information that Windows has always (supposedly) used that FC5 and earlier don't use. Hypothetically this should actually make the rendering in Rawhide closer to that of Windows, though there are a host of other possibilities that would cause rendering differences because OOo, just like Word which it is based on, is inherently suspectible to this sort of thing. I've certainly seen pagination differences when upgrading between versions of Word, or between releases of Windows. Hypothetically, if OOo in FC5 rendered differently than on Windows, would you consider it a bug or a problem if it were changed for FC6 to render closer (even identical) to Windows but this made it different from FC5 and earlier? John Thacker
Attachment:
pgpLt5KPqYIr8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
