On 7/10/06, Erwin Rol <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
those are all technical reasons, here we (with we I mean software developers, and that includes me) are trying again to find a excuse to not make what the user wants. I would dare to bet with you that most users expect their ODF (or DOC) documents to look the same even if they open them 5 years later with a new version of OOo or Word (of course for some documents they might say "oh well strange that it is now 26 instead of 25 pages, but of well, probably just a little bug in my new version of Word").
People can want that.. but it is an upstream issue. I have had many Word 95 documents not do the right thing when being displayed in Word 2000 or Word XP. Fonts change, DPI changed and if the author was trying to be clever it just doesnt happen correctly. Heck I have had pdf's show up oddly if a font changed on the system. There are too many failure modes in software upgrades which is why some document systems bundled the fonts and layout engine with the document. This way the system is 'guarenteed' to have 99% reliability of showing the document the same each time. The documents also bloat up like popcorn bags. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
