On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 00:02 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: > Erwin Rol <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > > > Sometimes you wish that ppl writing things like OOo would pay as much > > attention to output quality as Donald Knuth :-/ > > Problem is that "that other office package" couldn't care less about output > quality, and many OOo users insist on pixel-exact rendering of the produced > junk... We are talking about documents written with OOo 2.0.2 and opened with OOo 2.0.3 or even OOo 2.0.2 of a few updates later, that "other office package" I have not used for years and years (before OOo I used LaTeX). It is simply not acceptable when Documents written on the same computer look different after some minor (OOo 2.0.2 -> OOo 2.0.2 + bugfix) updates look different. And worse, the documents look OK again when opened by OOo on "that other OS". - Erwin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
