On Jul 3, 2006, at 09:42, Erwin Rol wrote:
Build instructions are also available, SOPE:
http://sope.opengroupware.org/en/build/thirdparty.html
http://sope.opengroupware.org/en/build/sope.html
and OGo:
http://www.opengroupware.org/en/devs/build/ogo.html
Those do not work for you on a supported platform??? (i.e. not 64bit)
If not, please provide feedback! (feedback@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or one
of the mailing lists)
As explained in the other mail, its not the RPM's provided by OGo but
building the SRPM's in a Fedora compatible way.
The instructions above are for tarballs, not for RPMs. And together
with the existing specfiles it should be reasonably easy to produce a
set of Fedora compatible specs (in fact you only need to strip out
the generic $(var) stuff in the specfiles and you should be done).
(probably this is what Axel did?, I didn't know about it :-)
On 64bit the number of compiler warnings is just scary, it is very
unlikely that they are all harmless.
As mentioned again and again OGo is not (yet) ported to 64bit ;-)
This is probably not a hard task, but needs to be done (and yes you
are right, those warnings must be fixed for that ;-)
BTW stuff like that (those are the majority of the warnings when
compiling with gcc 4.1 on 32bit):
NGLdapAttribute.m:66: warning: pointer type mismatch in
conditional expression
are in fact harmless. Its due to a small bug in the GCC type checker.
(but there are probably others on 64bit which are problematic)
Axel wrote:
Since it is very unlikely that OGo and friends get into FC, should we
move this discussion to fedora-extras?
Thats probably a good idea ;-)
Greets,
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
