On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 11:30:48AM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:31 +0200, Helge Hess wrote: > > On Jun 28, 2006, at 18:24, Steven Pritchard wrote: > > > Are SRPMS or spec files available now? The last time I looked, I > > > couldn't find any. > > > > SRPMS no, spec files are included (and always were). The issue is > > that the specfiles expect a certain build environment and do not work > > standalone. But it shouldn't be too hard to strip that out and > > hardcode necessary values. > > > > http://svn.opengroupware.org/OpenGroupware.org/trunk/maintenance/ > > What would be needed to "fix" OGo so that it could be included in Fedora > Extras? And would there be others interested in working on this ? I'm working backwards in this thread, sorry. Yes, I'm very much interested, and I have sope and gnustep-make ready for submitting. But OGo itself needs some more love. Should I start submitting the dependencies into devel? Since it is very unlikely that OGo and friends get into FC, should we move this discussion to fedora-extras? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpT0blMwHXmW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
