On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:06:57PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 11:49 +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Helge Hess wrote: > > > Building OGo from source is a simple > > > ./configure; make install > > > > $ ./configure > > error: please specify a GNUstep make tree! > > > > Well, not really that simple. The dependencies are pretty heavy, according > > to http://www.opengroupware.org/en/devs/build/index.html > > > > Apparently : > > - GNUstep Make > > - GNUstep Objective-C Runtime > > - Libfoundation (implementation of the OpenStep Foundation API) > > - SOPE (application server) > > and then, you can build opengroupware.org > > > > I tried the spec files, but they are made to be generic (and thus complex) > > spec files, building on different distributions, and need external macro > > definitions (apparently in > > http://svn.opengroupware.org/OpenGroupware.org/trunk/maintenance/rpm_buildenvironment/macros/) > > > > At the moment, opengroupware *is* quite complicated to build. > > ATrpms has RPMS for FC6, but ATrpms also uses a bit incompatible build > system, but that should be more easy to adapt to FC/FE build system. > Just take a look at http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/ OGo and dependencies are something I wanted to contribute into FE. But there were some gcc objc issues that I had to bugzilla first that need to get resolved. See for example: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185398 (it's marked as fixed, but it reappears in another object build) The specfile's shape for OGo at ATrpms is not good. The dependencies are. So if you want to lend a hand rewrite the OGo specfile :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp7vSOpDGMHx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
