On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 11:16 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 07:58:44PM -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote: > > The RPM maintainer has already expressed displeasure with the idea of > > replacing SHA-1 with something better, so don't bother wasting your time > > there. > > Who are you talking about? You can't mean Jeff, he has already a proof > of concept implementation for sha1/sha256/sha384/sha512 file digests > in rpm-4.4.6-0.9. > That's not what he said in the bug he CLOSED WONTFIX, but, whatever. I don't really care. -- Nicholas Miell <nmiell@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
