On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:15 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 18:25 +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > > Over-engineering or not, binaries have nothing to do in source rpms, > They do. They are just "data". > > Or would you install a raytracer, just because a jpeg being used as > image somewhere is being generated by a raytracer? > > > especially not for an open source distribution like Fedora. And since > > they can be build from the source, there is no need for binaries in the > > first place. So to me using the binaries just sounds like > > lazy-engineering to me ;-) > Absolutely not: > > You are building a tool chain, you are not building nor supplying the > OS. The situation is not any different from building a native GCC under > Linux: You use the library binaries being provided elsewhere. Lets be gentlemen and agree to differ on this subject :-) - Erwin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
