Re: rpm packaging guideline question: differentiating between live/chroot installs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 19:02 -0700, Jane Dogalt wrote:
> 
> I forgot to add in first reply-
> 
> Does this mean that pre/post(un) scripts should be
> policywise-forbidden from
> doing anything which directly or indirectly tries to touch /proc,
> which in a
> chrooted environment, will not be mounted?  I have this hunch that
> I've run
> into rpms which do try to touch proc, though off the top of my head I
> can't
> point any fingers. 

/proc and a few other things often get mounted into chroot environments,
as they are needed.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux