seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 17:23 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > Still, why does it need computed again? > > > > > > What if something has changed since the last time the daemon ran? There > > > are cases which could end up installing/updating packages which you had > > > since done a removal around. And in any case, as long as the interface > > > is doing the updating, you have to have done all the hard stuff around > > > finding "what are the updates" > > > > But, if nothing has changed, why would it need to recompute dependencies (which > > it currently does...) > > how do we know if nothing has changed? Are we going to take a checksum > of the rpmdb? Heh. I suppose you could keep a timestamp, or the log of the last rpm transaction. Being able to do this simply would actually be a reason to have the code daemon-side. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
