On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 00:36 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > the Bluetooth library from bluez-libs-3.0 is fully backward compatible, > but our use of the library version info in bluez-libs-2.x was actually > kinda broken and so I decided to have a new clean start. I now this is > going to make some trouble now, but in the long run it is worth it. OK. > > Should we go ahead and update it, then also rebuild libbtctl, > > gnome-bluetooth, etc? > > I would prefer that. > > > And would someone _please_ take bluez-pin off my hands -- I know nothing > > about dbus and GTK+, and except for the dbus requests, bluez-pin doesn't > > really interact with the _Bluetooth_ stuff at all. > > Drop it at all. It is no longer working anymore. We need something new > and I am going to release a bluez-gnome package really soon. In the context of Fedora Core 6 Test 1, 'really soon' needs to be within about three days, I believe¹. If bluez-libs-3.0 breaks bluez-pin, and if we don't have a replacement yet, then I think we need to stick with what we have now. -- dwmw2 ¹ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Core/Schedule -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
