On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 22:00 +1000, David Timms wrote: > > Note all the stuff in the actual header, especially: > HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found > Throwing away the header that has the correct info in it is what is > going wrong. From what someone said urlgrabber is used in yum -> > shouldn't urlgrabber then return fail if the server is stating html > errors eg 404, no matter how pretty the 404 looks to a human using > their > web browser ? Didn't Seth say that f.r.c was fixed and thus would not make a very good test case? -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
