Akira TAGOH wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:14 +0900,
"JP" == Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JP> I would like to suggest using "/etc/X11/xinit/xinputrc" for the system
JP> file instead of "/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/default", since that seems
JP> more consistent and logical IMHO.
Well, can you explain more details how it works?
right now all xinput scripts such as scim, uim etc etc is
put under /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d and symlinks for
alternatives as well. are you suggesting to just replace
/etc/X11/xinit/xinit.d/default to /etc/X11/xinit/xinputrc?
i.e. alternatives --install /etc/X11/xinit/xinputrc
xinput-default /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/scim 81?
Ah, you're right I hadn't thought it through clearly enough.
So we need to keep "/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/" as you say,
but I still think it is a good idea to move
"/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/default" to "/etc/X11/xinit/xinputrc".
JP> So basically the current locale selecting code in xinput.sh will move
JP> to this alternative script for xim client setup. We could also
JP> consider renaming "/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/" to say
JP> "/etc/X11/xinit/xim.d/" at the same time: that would avoid confusion
JP> between the old xinput.d system and the new xinputrc system.
Sounds good - then where should be xinput scripts put onto?
So then maybe it is better to just keep everything in "xinput.d/" or
rename it to "xinputrc.d/"?
Jens
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
