Re: UnleashKDE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 10:16 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 08:44 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Speaking of which, IMO, here's a list of kde bits that are very
> >> Extras-worthy:
> >> kdeaddons
> >> kdeadmin
> >> kdeartwork (since xscreensaver -> Extras)
> >> kdebindings
> >> kdeedu
> >> kdegames
> >> kdeutils
> >> kdewebdev
> > 
> > FWIW, I'd be interested in exploring moving some of these to Extras to
> > start "testing the waters" as it were -- 
> 
> Cool.
> 
> > one question which springs 
> > to mind is how does this interact with the monolithic blob that is
> > kde-i18n?
> 
> No direct interaction.  The kde-i18n packages are monolithic in that they
> provide translations for *all* kde packages (regardless of whether the apps
> for which they provide translations are installed or not).

Right, but as the packages are maintained more independently, I think it
becomes more important to actually have the translations with the code.
Otherwise, it becomes much more of a coordination problem to update just
one piece.

Then again, I've thought that kde-i18n is broken by design forever ;-)

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux