> Some libs in /lib also need other libs in /usr, in my setup, there is > (avoiding some dups): > libcrypto.so.0.9.8a > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x0029a000) > libnss_wins.so > libldap-2.3.so.0 => /usr/lib/libldap-2.3.so.0 (0x00880000) > liblber-2.3.so.0 => /usr/lib/liblber-2.3.so.0 (0x00a96000) > libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00295000) > libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x002ae000) > libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00a15000) > libkrb5support.so.0 => /usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x00460000) > libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x001f5000) > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x00211000) > and libssl.so.0.9.8a > libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x004d2000) > libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x002fd000) > libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00374000) > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x0029a000) > libkrb5support.so.0 => /usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x002f7000) Should I fill bugs against libz/openldap/krb5/cyrus-sasl? -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
