2006/6/1, dragoran <dragoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Thomas J. Baker wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:16 +0200, dragoran wrote: > >> Thomas J. Baker wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:32 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 5/31/06, Thomas J. Baker <tjb@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Fixed with today's update. Menus are a much too translucent though... >>>>> Would that be metacity or something else? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Assuming you define 'too translucent' like I do, meaning any >>>> translucency at all, the fix is to turn off the bling completely. >>>> >>>> >>>> --jef"So who is going to sponsor the usability study to determine the >>>> best level of default transparency percentage down to the fifth >>>> significant digit? I simply can't wait to read over the minutia of >>>> that discussion. blaaaaah"spaleta >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193655 >>> >>> At first blush, being a bling fanboy, I thought it was just too much >>> translucency and could be tweaked. The more I think about it though, the >>> more I lean towards menus not being translucent at all. >>> >>> tjb >>> >>> >> any screenshot? >> >> > > http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb/Screenshot.png > > tjb > ok thats a joke ... how about making the this optional? menu translucent? yes - no if yes xx% -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
configureable is always better than hardcoded. regards, Rudolf Kastl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
