Ok, so this seems like it should be a fairly common configuration and there's no method I can see to define it entirely via System V configuration files. Say you have two network interfaces on two different networks and with two different default routes. This can be used, for instance, if you had two different ISPs and wanted to provide the same services to both links from one server. You can set up two routing tables for each default route, and set up a rule that any packets originating from a particular network must be responded to through the same corresponding gateway: ip rule add from 192.168.0.0/24 lookup 100 pref 100 ip route add table 100 default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth1 Now, being able to define a GATEWAY for each interface definition (eg: ifcfg-eth0) IMPLIES (at least in my mind) that you can define a different default route to use to respond to packets received from a particular interface. This, however, is not the case. :) I'm not sure how this variable is typically meant to be used. Can this be made into a new feature, or am I going about this all wrong? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
