On 5/29/06, Callum Lerwick <seg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 10:08 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > What's wrong with GPL programs using the Mozilla implementation? > > Last time I checked NSS was totally GPL compatible. > > mozilla-nss requires mozilla-nspr. libnss3.so also pulls in > libpthread.so. Those are pretty heavy requirements for SSL. Even OpenSSL is so bloaty that the smallest I can get it down to (on MIPS, who's code size seem to be about 2x i386) is 1.5mb. Making it impossible to fit into the 2mb flash on a belkin router. Sigh. There's MatrixSSL, but there's next to nothing that actually uses it...
What do you want to do in 2MB? I mean in that space I doubt you could get many encryption algorithm beyond 1 or 2 ( one for key exchange, one for cipher). At that size point, I would just look for whatever encryptions are in the kernel source code and use those all the time. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
