Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2006, 13:33 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:53:58 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 May 2006 23:19:01 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > > > >> extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Mon May 29 23:00:43 CDT 2006 > > >> Number failed to build: 176 > > >> Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 1 > > >> Leaving: 175 > > >> (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) > > >> > > >> Of those expected to have worked... > > >> Without a bug filed: 173 > > >> ---------------------------------- > > >> abe > > >> alacarte > > >> amaya > > >> anjuta-gdl > > >> balsa > > > > > > -snip- > > > > > > Note sure what the goal of this rebuild attempt is. Extras buildsys uses > > > mock for a long time. So every package in Extras has built successfully in > > > mock before. Most (if not all) of the rebuild failures you've caught here > > > are due to updates in Rawhide, such as compiler updates or API changes. > > > This report is misleading. > > > > No, it's because he's building the packages with the reduced build > > environment that closely matches the exceptions list in the packaging > > guidelines rather than default mock configuration that pulls in lots of > > extra packages. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-May/msg00807.html for further details. [...] > Is this modified version of mock ready and available in Extras? No modified version is required. mdomsch simply uses a local version of the data at http://fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/ e.g. a trimmed down version of http://fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/5/i386/buildroots.xml CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
