On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 20:33 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > Part of my reason for entering and prolonging this thread is to increase > the documentation for elfutils. Eliciting Ulrich Drepper's remark: > > - the tools in elfutils compared with binutils are a) smaller, b) faster > > (several times, usually), c) less buggy, d) more featureful > counts as a success, which would be even more signficant if accompanied > by some data to substantiate claims. I even made a deliberate mistake > in using "rpm -qR" which Nicholas Miell pointed out should have been > "--whatrequires" instead. I believe that the output (which indicates > uses by rpm and rpm-python), and Ulrich Drepper's remarks about Red Hat > legal department and copyrights, reveal significant new information > to the Fedora community about the reasons why elfutils is the way it is. > Elfutils is effectively part of RPM. Elfutils is a part of the Red Hat > "crown jewels," which confers special status on elfutils. I don't know what drugs you're on, but please stop dragging me into your paranoid delusions. -- Nicholas Miell <nmiell@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
