On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 09:35 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 18:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > It might not much have much code but it is project that has a user > > visible component that provides a important functionality. If > > announcements about such development is made it helps in more than one > > way > > > > The community can understand what work is being done and get involved > > Documentation team can document these changes in the release notes and > > other documents > > Ambassadors can talk about it etc. > > it's 288 lines of code right now. > > If I took the time to write an email about each thing we've started on > I'd never have the time to actually start anything. > > no one else was going to do it from what I could tell, despite the spec > being on the wiki for quite sometime. Jeremy posted about the "puplet" in his blog, carried on the Fedora People planet feed last week: http://katzj.livejournal.com/388499.html This has a lot of community visibility in itself, but Rahul is right that more publicity is a Good Thing. However, in the time it took to carry on this back-and-forth, anyone could have sent the link to Thomas Chung at Fedora News so he can publicize it in the next issue, and changed the wiki page. (I've taken care of that.) Let's try not to badger folks who are getting work done, and instead spend our time more constructively. Thomas, if you could point this out in the next FedoraNews issue, it would be greatly appreciated, thanks! -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
