On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:23:07AM -0400, Dimi Paun wrote: > On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 01:16 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > On the other hand, there are many applications included both > > in Fedora Core, and in Fedora Extras, which do rely on the > > core fonts system still, and are likely to rely on it for the > > forseeable future. > > Great to hear we're moving in this direction. > > I guess the obvious question is "what will break?". Once we > have a clear idea what really depends on xfs (some packages, > like wine, _can_ work with xfs if it's the only available > option, or without), we can devise a plan of making xfs > optional (moved to Extra along with all apps that depend > on it?). > > Regardless, I'm sure such a list would help fix some apps. > OSS community is rather good I find at this sort of focused > cleanup efforts. +1. See how many BuildRequires are being fixed from a similar QA project. Blocker bug against apps that require xfs, and start tracking those. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
