Hi David, I work at Microsoft in the VISTA Firewall team. And I can tell you that VISTA requires about 512 megs, to run. ANd that is just to run the OS. Fedora being GUI as well will never need such requirements as M$ has a HUGE lead over 'Look and Feel' of a GUI based computer experience. THe main thing to worry about is to not worry about VISTA at all... since Vista WILL require computer hardware upgrades 100% guarenttee on that, most will not instantly jump at the idea of VISTA. Unless RAM and CPU along with video card excelleration cards come down in price to compete with Dell < $250 for a cedently powered computer. However, things are only getting FASTER and BIGGER. ( I.e. Hard drives, RAM and Video Memory is BIGGER... CPU, Memory, Bus and interface speeds are getting FASTER ). VISTA I believe is only following the trends in hardware... Microsoft and Open Source will always be Apples and Oranges and one should never compare the two. Its just like debating religion and philosophy... it is to no end. --- David <david.jamison1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Ive just joined this mailing list and I am in intending to get involved > with the testing effort within the Feodra project. Just by way of > introduction I am based in Belfast Ireland and I work as a software > tester within a large software house working predominately on web-site > testing with a chunk of interoperability and linkage testing thrown in. > > My question is probably way "off topic" but none the less I would be > interested in hearing peoples comments. > > I tend to run older hardware because > > 1. Cost. > 2. This older kit provides all the functionality I need at home as Im > not big into gaming or heavy multimedia or the like > 3. An element of "save the earth". > > There was an article in the paper yesterday that claims that MS Vista 's > full range of tools would be available to less than 5% of all PC's in > Britian (presumably this would extrapolate world wide) I was then > reading over the thread on PAE and Zen and it occured to me that perhaps > the same issue might rise with Fedora? > > I do fully realise that and OS needs to keep abreast of hardware > developments but Im wondering if this has to be to the detriment of the > folks like me who tend to run behind the times. > > Perhaps a solution would be to ask ANACONDA to identify hardware > resources available on a box and then provide a suggested build of > Fedora to be intstalled that will provide only the functionality the > hardware is capable of running sucessfully? > > Cheers > > David > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
