On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 16:34 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > Caolan McNamara wrote : > > > On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 16:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am facing a bizarre issue on rpmbuilding *some* rpms on FC5: > > > > > > rpmbuild doesn't build debuginfos, despite the package contains > > > binaries[1]. > > > > > > Also, on packages exposing these symptoms, executables don't seem get > > > stripped: > > > $ rpmlint ~/src/rpms/RPMS/i386/xxx-0.0.2-0.fc5.i386.rpm > > > ... > > > W: xxx unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/xyz > > > > The created binaries might not have permissions which allow them to be > > written by the rpmbuild-ing owner. > ...or the binary might have had setuid or setgid bits set. #8() > Not sure why, > but binaries don't get stripped properly in that case. Not in the cases I trip over this issue. These are normal application, with nothing special about them. Actually, as it seems, the more trivial a package is, the more likely it seems to be hit by the problem. Even a package containing "hello world" and building in mock exposes this problem ;). > No idea about the debuginfo packages not being created, though, since in > my experience, even if there are no binaries in the package, you'll get > one (although empty) as long as the package isn't explicitly "noarch". I had wanted to send an example src.rpm of a package exposing the issue to this list, but the FESCo/RH God reigning this list has proven to insist on ridiculously unreasonable low limits on postings ... which had forced me to file this PR to ... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192422 Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
