Once upon a time, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> said: > On 5/17/06, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - Present for acceptance any end user licenses that are part of the > > JDK, if such licenses are included in the generic install bundle > > provided to you for repackaging. > > > >Click-through license required - not acceptable, especially during > >install (how would an automated kickstart even do this?). > > If the same trick the rpms for flash use is acceptable, then there > isnt a problem. Somewhere I think it said the license had to be accepted "before install". > -jef"not holding his breath"spaleta Given all the other issues, I don't think it really matters. The conflict with GCJ and such is a much bigger issue; I don't see Fedora dropping GCJ or the alternatives system that allows either GCJ or the Sun JDK for development. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
