On Fri, May 5, 2006 10:32 am, Ola Thoresen wrote: > The main issue I had last time I tested zimbra was that it had to "take > over" the entire server (xen comes to mind, but that was not an option > at the time). That is indeed a nasty thing. I haven't personally installed Zimbra, but I was planning to do so soon, but this may be a deal breaker for me. > It would not allow you to use the existing accounts, imap-server, > smtp-server and all other already running services. > I'd prefer something that will live and play nicely with an existing > installation, so I can access my mail with both mutt, imap, mapi and > webmail - depending on where I am and what client I have available. But doesn't Zimbra offer IMAP/IMAPS support? What about POP/POPS? I thought it did... -- Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Lattica, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
