I didn't mean previous FC CDs. But keeping rpm's more structured on CD's. So keep the dependent rpm's at least on the same CD. Just did a mysql server installation, needed 2 CDs.
What I "felt" in your words (and saw in previous discussions) is that future FC releases RPMs will have less or no dependencies. That is another solution of-course, but IMHO harder to maintain in later future.
The later: only 2CDs, would be great. But is it known what FC users are using?
2006/5/4, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 08:45 +0200, Peter Bieshaar wrote:
> First I am wondering the strategy the rpm's are put on the different
> CDs.
I suspect it's primarily about "don't have dependencies on packages on a
future CD", so that during installation you never need to go back to an
older CD.
Beyond that I suspect there is a goal built in to have a basic install
only use one or two cds...
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Peter Bieshaar
NL(0)6 29577255
use this or: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
