On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 12:58 +0200, dragoran wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Should packages with source from outside of the xorg-x11 tree carry > > this prefix (e.g. ivtv, nvidia, ati, etc)? E.g. is this a prefix like > > often used "for <prefix>" or is it a cendor prefix, e.g. "by > > <prefix>"? > > > > How would a 3rd party driver package be best named? > > xorg-x11-drv-<driver> or <3rd-party-vendor>-drv-<driver>? > > > > I would say use > > xorg-x11-drv-<driver> > > the second one only confuses users. but xorg-x11 is the name of the upstream vendor, and probably trademarked or close to that. So I would suggest to not do that; even if it's not a legal trademark, it makes sure that users realize where it comes from (and thus where to report bugs ;) > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
