Re: ipw3945 packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:00:16PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:58 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:08:27AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > > The answer as always for drivers in the main kernel package is "get it
> > > upstream".  And for better or worse, I think that the regulatory daemon
> > > is likely to be a big sticking point for the driver going upstream :(
> > 
> > It sounded like this was more liked than the firmware approach.
> 
> By who?  I read exactly the opposite :)

I read an article by thl on heise.de (in german), where it was
supposed to be considered better that propriatry kernel stuff
or. Maybe I should check the original tone.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpX6qt9zFjcx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux