On Tuesday 25 April 2006 05:15am, Michael A. Peters wrote: > On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 14:39 +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 18:02 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > On 4/21/06, Alo Tsum <alotsum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > First suggestions has to do with the software side of things. We > > > > users need a competent software installer which is graphical based. > > > > > > The problem here is that there are several options, and Fedora has > > > chosen to stick with Pirut. I am personally not a fan of the GUI style > > > used by Pirut, but it is quite possible that I am in the minority in > > > this regard. > > > > Perhaps a minority, but definately not alone. It's hard to believe that > > it comes from the same vendor that proposed the HIG. > > Pirut is good for getting the OS installed fast and then installing > groups of software. > > Individual packages is better done with yum. > > pirut might benefit from some interface changes, but imho it also needs > to be able to install updates to existing software at the same time it > installs new software - so that after installing Fedora, you can just > use pirut to pick your packages - and at the same yum transaction it > will install available updates. Here, here! -- Lamont R. Peterson <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Senior Instructor Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ] GPG Key fingerprint: F98C E31A 5C4C 834A BCAB 8CB3 F980 6C97 DC0D D409
Attachment:
pgpCNnRYwuGZE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
