On 4/24/06, Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:27 pm, Andy Green said: > > Dimi Paun wrote: > > I can see why it makes people say "go there yourself and champion > > your bug" because really RHAT doesn't owe us the work. > > Absolutely. I would never expect RHAT to relay my problems from > one mailing list to another. That would be stupid and counter > productive. > > But this is not at all what I'm asking for. Truth is that by the > nature of the people Red Hat hired, they have quite a number of > folks involved in highly visible projects. The oppinions of these > guys matter in those projects. I would like RHAT to listen to their > customers (like any decent company), and push for changes that they > consider worthwhile where they can. And this can be done in a lot > of places, especially in difficult to talk to projects like GNOME. > > This _is_ a development related issue, and I think it is very much > on topic for this list. We were told Fedora is essential part of RHAT > model, which was pretty clear from the beginning. That's fine. I have > used RHAT since 4.0, and I'm glad to see RHAT acknowladge this fact. > However, this comes with some responsabilities, and one of it is listening > to customer feedback (within limits, of course). Is RHAT willing to > do that? > Do you have ideas on how this can be done cleanly? There are tons of issues and they need to be evaluated in the order of getting them fixed/changed. I mean I would love spatial sent back to the Windows95 heck it belongs in... but that doesnt mean everyone else does. Gathering the information, prioritizing it, and then championing it. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
