On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 22:49 -0400, Jon Nettleton wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 04:42 +0200, Miloslav Trmac wrote: > > Arthur Pemberton napsal(a): > > > Well I can take your word on that. However, it is handly encouraging > > > when one selects all KDE apps in Anaconda-Pirut and then I boot and > > > find gdm. And the only way to fix tha tis to manually uninstall gdm or > > > edit /etc/X11/predm > > It is hardly encouraging to see posts implying that KDE is intentionally > > crippled" on fedora-devel ;) > > > > (echo DISPLAYMANAGER=KDE >> /etc/sysconfig/desktop) > > Mirek > > > I hardly think that KDE is intentionally crippled at all. If anything > my guess is that it just isn't as thoroughly tested. I think this > reflects more on the participation of KDE users in the testing process > of the Fedora development process. I guess the only proof to that > statement would be some fancy bugzilla reporting. If a bug exists for > one community or the other, it isn't going to be fixed unless it is > reported. One factor to consider is those that have a preference for either KDE or Gnome are likely to choose a distro that defaults to their preferred desktop. So, since Fedora defaults to Gnome, it's more likely that Gnome users will use it (which makes it a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy). I wouldn't be surprised to find that distros that default to KDE get less testing with Gnome. R. -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
