Re: AIGLX packages for FC5 (and rawhide)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Josh Boyer wrote:

On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:05:09AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:

Are there any differences between the FC5 and rawhide packages?  I was
working with Bill Nottingham last night, who has an identical graphics
card, and his setup was working with AIGLX whereas mine wasn't.  The
only difference that we could see was that Bill was running rawhide, and
I was running FC5.

There shouldn't be, should just be a backport to FC5.  I'll verify this
today.

That would be great.

If there's no major differences in the aiglx packages, could the difference
in kernel versions between FC5 and rawhide have something to do with it?
That was asked on IRC, and graphics stuff is a black box to me so I have
no idea.

Would it be also possible (assuming that it works) of getting x86_64 packages for AIGLX? I don't want to have to move everything on my laptop to rawhide quite yet.

--
"Waiter! This lambchop tastes like an old sock!" - Sheri Lewis

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux