On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 19:36 +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote: > > If someone wants to sit there and bitch about things and expect someone else > > to go fix them all the time, they can kindly move the fuck on. Now, if they > > want to actually contribute, that is the attitude we want. And that is a great > > attitude for the future of Fedora. > > I'd be happy to patch anaconda to have "everything" again. I'm > probably going to in practice. I will submit the patch if you want, > but I know it will be rejected, so what's the point? So the question is: could you, instead of patching it for this, help devise a better way that we could use in the future? We need to handle multiple repositories, repositories with overlapping package names, etc., and "just install it all" doesn't make *any* sense. It's time for a new way to do it. Instead of rehashing the same thread over and over, we need to be looking for a way to better address the issue. -- Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
