On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:39:20 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org> wrote: > There's no real standard for how updates like this are numbered/labeled; > "-9.1.fc5" might have been more clear. > In any case, "9.fc5" sorts as higher than "9", so RPM knows it's a new > version. I think you are under estimating hard job of package mantainers... There is also a wiki on this, but I didn't find it useful to understand this "fc5" appended to an already fc5 previous package...: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines?action=show&redirect=PackageNamingGuidelines -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
