Erwin Rol wrote:
I don't know how, but the problem is back again today;
Updating : libgnome ##################### [
1/295]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
- Erwin
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 12:15 -0400, Richard Hally wrote:
for several days, ldconfig has been throwing the following errors:
Updating : subversion ##################### [ 19/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
Updating : libstdc++-devel ##################### [ 20/106]
Updating : libgnat ##################### [ 21/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
Updating : libobjc ##################### [ 22/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
Updating : xorg-x11-server-Xorg ##################### [ 23/106]
Updating : metacity ##################### [ 24/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
Updating : libgomp ##################### [ 25/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
Updating : cpp ##################### [ 26/106]
Updating : gcc ##################### [ 27/106]
Updating : libgfortran ##################### [ 28/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
The pertinent part of /usr/lib looks like this:
[root@LinuxNew2 lib]# ll libhe*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16846 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Mar 31 10:03 libhesiod.so -> libhesiod.so.0.0.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42747 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.so.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40863 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.so.0.0.0
[root@LinuxNew2 lib]#
How should this be fixed?
I am seeing this also and don't see a bz on it. Should there be a bz?
--
Regards,
Old Fart
(my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
